StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7782.TWO$25.55-0.39%
Fair $25.55+0.0%

7782.TWO

7782.TWO

Industrials / ConglomeratesTaipei Exchange

$25.55

-0.10 (-0.39%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $25.55Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 40/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $58.2M · quality 45.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 20/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

40/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 7782.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 7782.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$590M

P/E

12.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.3x

↓

ROE

9.5%

↑

Gross Margin

68.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.65

↑
52-Week Range$26
$25$52

TradingView lightweight chart

7782.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $25.55Periodo -52.9%
Fair value: $25.55

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-15.4%

FCF / Net income

-2.36x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $699.8M · net income $45.8M · FCF $-108.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

68.5%+1.8% pts

Operating margin

8.4%-2.8% pts

Net margin

6.5%-1.5% pts

FCF margin

-15.4%-14.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$699.8M$699.8M$711.4M$633.4M$670.4M
Net Income$45.8M$45.8M$60.5M$16.4M$53.7M
EBITDA$99.0M$99.0M$102.5M$47.0M$87.0M
EPS——3.071.003.28
Gross Margin68.5%68.5%69.7%61.6%66.7%
Operating Margin8.4%8.4%10.1%7.1%11.2%
Net Margin6.5%6.5%8.5%2.6%8.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.650.650.180.500.34
Current Ratio2.212.21———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-108.1M$-108.1M$58.2M$94.3M$-3.9M
Returns
ROE9.5%9.5%13.8%7.6%27.4%
Valuation
P/E12.0512.0513.71——
EV/EBITDA6.326.326.17——
P/B1.221.221.89——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-1.6%-1.6%12.3%-5.5%—
EPS Growth——207.0%-69.5%—
Dividend Yield19.6%19.6%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -22.3%

Total return

-22.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

3.07 → n/d

Residual

-41.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+19.6%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-41.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.