StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7806.TWO$66.80+0.00%
Fair $66.80+0.0%

7806.TWO

7806.TWO

Healthcare / BiotechnologyTaipei Exchange

$66.80

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $66.80Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 37/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-176.2M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

37/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 7806.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 7806.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.9B

P/E

22.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

14.5x

↑

ROE

9.7%

↑

Gross Margin

30.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.30

↑
52-Week Range$67
$60$82

TradingView lightweight chart

7806.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $66.80Periodo -8.9%
Fair value: $66.80

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+56.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-44.0%

FCF / Net income

-3.14x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $538.6M · net income $75.3M · FCF $-236.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

30.4%-5.4% pts

Operating margin

17.1%-6.6% pts

Net margin

14.0%-7.2% pts

FCF margin

-44.0%-101.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$538.6M$538.6M$435.1M$403.6M$139.4M
Net Income$75.3M$75.3M$66.8M$82.4M$29.6M
EBITDA$136.0M$136.0M$114.3M$129.5M$57.6M
EPS——3.014.242.27
Gross Margin30.4%30.4%31.8%37.4%35.8%
Operating Margin17.1%17.1%19.4%25.5%23.7%
Net Margin14.0%14.0%15.3%20.4%21.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.300.300.440.890.55
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-236.8M$-236.8M$-50.2M$-176.2M$79.9M
Returns
ROE9.7%9.7%14.1%32.1%21.2%
Valuation
P/E21.9721.9724.58——
EV/EBITDA14.5214.5215.16——
P/B2.402.403.48——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth23.8%23.8%7.8%189.4%—
EPS Growth——-29.0%86.5%—
Dividend Yield1.5%1.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -1.7%

Total return

-1.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

3.01 → n/d

Residual

-3.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-3.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.