StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7837.TWO$100.50-2.90%
Fair $100.50+0.0%

7837.TWO

7837.TWO

Healthcare / BiotechnologyTaipei Exchange

$100.50

-3.00 (-2.90%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $100.50Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 40/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $82.0M · quality 46.3/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 28/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

40/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 7837.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 7837.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.2B

P/E

19.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

9.5x

↓

ROE

16.4%

↑

Gross Margin

40.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.49

↑
52-Week Range$101
$89$128

TradingView lightweight chart

7837.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $100.50Periodo -9.0%
Fair value: $100.50

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+11.1%

FCF CAGR

+11.8%

FCF margin

7.5%

FCF / Net income

0.69x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.10B · net income $118.4M · FCF $82.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

40.9%-0.2% pts

Operating margin

12.8%-6.7% pts

Net margin

10.8%-3.2% pts

FCF margin

7.5%+0.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.10B$1.10B$860.6M$684.0M$800.7M
Net Income$118.4M$118.4M$95.0M$60.8M$112.1M
EBITDA$244.3M$244.3M$209.5M$145.8M$228.2M
EPS——4.534.148.33
Gross Margin40.9%40.9%40.6%37.0%41.1%
Operating Margin12.8%12.8%12.3%7.8%19.5%
Net Margin10.8%10.8%11.0%8.9%14.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.490.490.660.930.27
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$82.0M$82.0M$179.3M$-53.8M$58.6M
Returns
ROE16.4%16.4%15.3%20.8%30.3%
Valuation
P/E19.4019.40———
EV/EBITDA9.509.50———
P/B3.103.10———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth27.7%27.7%25.8%-14.6%—
EPS Growth——9.4%-50.3%—
Dividend Yield2.0%2.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -7.1%

Total return

-7.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

4.53 → n/d

Residual

-9.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-9.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.