StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7935.KL$0.60+0.00%
Fair $0.60+0.0%

7935.KL

Milux Corporation Berhad

Consumer Cyclical / Furnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesKuala Lumpur

$0.60

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.60Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 47/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.3M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 6/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

47/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 7935.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Milux Corporation Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$141M

P/E

30.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

32.6x

↑

ROE

8.1%

↑

Gross Margin

19.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$1
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

7935.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.600Periodo -37.8%
Fair value: $0.600

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+18.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-10.5%

FCF / Net income

-3.20x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $99.6M · net income $3.3M · FCF $-10.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

19.6%-5.2% pts

Operating margin

2.9%-4.1% pts

Net margin

3.3%-2.0% pts

FCF margin

-10.5%-4.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$99.6M$99.6M$45.9M$47.0M$59.3M
Net Income$3.3M$3.3M$-2.3M$-5.0M$3.1M
EBITDA$4.2M$4.2M$-587449.00$-2.8M$5.5M
EPS——-0.01-0.020.01
Gross Margin19.6%19.6%22.3%22.1%24.9%
Operating Margin2.9%2.9%-5.4%-8.9%7.0%
Net Margin3.3%3.3%-4.9%-10.6%5.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.030.140.15
Current Ratio2.122.12———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-10.5M$-10.5M$2.7M$1.3M$-3.5M
Returns
ROE8.1%8.1%-6.0%-12.2%6.9%
Valuation
P/E30.0030.00——54.89
EV/EBITDA32.5832.58——31.17
P/B3.483.483.173.503.77
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth116.7%116.7%-2.2%-20.8%—
EPS Growth——54.7%-259.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +27.7%

Total return

+27.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → n/d

Residual

+27.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+27.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.