StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8044.KL$0.07+0.00%
Fair $0.07+0.0%

8044.KL

Computer Forms (Malaysia) Berhad

Industrials / Specialty Business ServicesKuala Lumpur

$0.07

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.07Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 17/F
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.2M · quality 73.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 39/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

17/100

F

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -1.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 8044.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Computer Forms (Malaysia) Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$22M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-1.8%

↓

Gross Margin

-3.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

8044.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.070Periodo -81.0%
Fair value: $0.070

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-25.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-19.7%

FCF / Net income

1.01x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $11.4M · net income $-2.2M · FCF $-2.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

-3.8%-17.8% pts

Operating margin

-19.9%-21.9% pts

Net margin

-19.5%-239.1% pts

FCF margin

-19.7%-13.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$11.4M$11.4M$27.5M$27.2M
Net Income$-2.2M$-2.2M$-4.5M$59.7M
EBITDA$-1.8M$-1.8M$-3.7M$62.5M
EPS-0.01-0.01-0.020.29
Gross Margin-3.8%-3.8%3.2%14.1%
Operating Margin-19.9%-19.9%-16.3%2.0%
Net Margin-19.5%-19.5%-16.4%219.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.050.08
Current Ratio26.9526.95——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.2M$-2.2M$-6.4M$-1.6M
Returns
ROE-1.8%-1.8%-3.8%93.7%
Valuation
P/E———2.85
EV/EBITDA———2.66
P/B0.170.170.312.67
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-58.6%-58.6%1.0%—
EPS Growth55.6%55.6%-105.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -26.3%

Total return

-26.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.02 → -0.01

Residual

-26.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-26.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.