StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8077.T$207.00-0.96%
Fair $207.00+0.0%

8077.T

TORQ Inc.

Industrials / Industrial DistributionTokyo

$207.00

-2.00 (-0.96%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $207.00Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 34/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.8B · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 25/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

34/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 8077.TLocal privado en este navegador · TORQ Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$4.7B

P/E

5.2x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.6x

↓

ROE

6.3%

↑

Gross Margin

22.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.90

↑
52-Week Range$207
$200$278

TradingView lightweight chart

8077.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $206.00Periodo +5.6%
Fair value: $207.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

9.0%

FCF / Net income

2.25x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $22.54B · net income $904.9M · FCF $2.03B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

22.9%+0.6% pts

Operating margin

4.5%+2.4% pts

Net margin

4.0%+1.4% pts

FCF margin

9.0%+18.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$22.54B$22.54B$22.41B$21.76B$20.48B
Net Income$904.9M$904.9M$895.5M$845.4M$532.2M
EBITDA$1.86B$1.86B$1.87B$1.84B$1.18B
EPS——36.4834.0421.48
Gross Margin22.9%22.9%22.6%22.6%22.3%
Operating Margin4.5%4.5%4.0%3.6%2.0%
Net Margin4.0%4.0%4.0%3.9%2.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.900.901.001.071.25
Current Ratio1.381.38———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$2.03B$2.03B$-67.8M$1.77B$-2.03B
Returns
ROE6.3%6.3%6.7%6.8%4.8%
Valuation
P/E5.195.196.147.6410.01
EV/EBITDA7.627.628.739.2714.88
P/B0.330.330.390.520.48
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth0.6%0.6%3.0%6.2%—
EPS Growth——7.2%58.5%—
Dividend Yield2.9%2.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -8.7%

Total return

-8.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

36.48 → n/d

Residual

-11.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-11.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.