StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
81P.F$47.00+0.00%
Fair $47.00+0.0%

81P.F

81P.F

Industrials / ConglomeratesFrankfurt

$47.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $47.00Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 1/9
High Debt

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $4.7M · quality 32.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 39/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 2.41, above the 2.0 threshold
Thesis & Journal · 81P.FLocal privado en este navegador · 81P.F
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$141M

P/E

81.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

24.6x

↑

ROE

9.6%

↑

Gross Margin

10.7%

↓

Debt/Equity

2.41

↑
52-Week Range$47
$41$51

TradingView lightweight chart

81P.F price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $47.00Periodo +9.8%
Fair value: $47.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+11.7%

FCF CAGR

+14.4%

FCF margin

20.8%

FCF / Net income

1.47x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $22.6M · net income $3.2M · FCF $4.7M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

10.7%+10.4% pts

Operating margin

8.2%+11.8% pts

Net margin

14.2%+13.7% pts

FCF margin

20.8%+1.4% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$22.6M$22.6M$37.5M$35.3M$16.3M
Net Income$3.2M$3.2M$16.7M$-1.7M$77000.00
EBITDA$9.0M$9.0M$22.4M$2.7M$817000.00
EPS——5.46-0.560.03
Gross Margin10.7%10.7%17.9%19.7%0.3%
Operating Margin8.2%8.2%16.0%16.8%-3.6%
Net Margin14.2%14.2%44.7%-4.7%0.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity2.412.411.585.461.90
Current Ratio0.420.42———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$4.7M$4.7M$51.1M$4.4M$3.1M
Returns
ROE9.6%9.6%55.6%-11.3%0.4%
Valuation
P/E81.0381.03———
EV/EBITDA24.6224.62———
P/B4.224.22———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-39.6%-39.6%6.1%117.2%—
EPS Growth——1083.8%-2234.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +9.8%

Total return

+9.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

5.46 → n/d

Residual

+9.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+9.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.