StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8200.T$2085.00-0.62%
Fair $2085.00+0.0%

8200.T

Ringer Hut Co.,Ltd.

Consumer Cyclical / RestaurantsTokyo

$2085.00

-13.00 (-0.62%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2085.00Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 35/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $930.3M · quality 50.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 35/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

35/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 8200.TLocal privado en este navegador · Ringer Hut Co.,Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$54.0B

P/E

31.3x

↑

EV/EBITDA

16.2x

↑

ROE

11.3%

↑

Gross Margin

65.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.52

↑
52-Week Range$2085
$2069$2391

TradingView lightweight chart

8200.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2,085Periodo +77.4%
Fair value: $2,085

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

2.2%

FCF / Net income

0.57x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $45.08B · net income $1.73B · FCF $991.8M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

65.7%+0.9% pts

Operating margin

3.1%+3.9% pts

Net margin

3.8%+4.9% pts

FCF margin

2.2%+4.1% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$45.08B$45.08B$43.79B$40.21B$37.73B
Net Income$1.73B$1.73B$968.5M$752.0M$-403.2M
EBITDA$3.67B$3.67B$3.43B$2.98B$1.98B
EPS———29.03-15.56
Gross Margin65.7%65.7%65.9%66.7%64.9%
Operating Margin3.1%3.1%3.9%2.5%-0.8%
Net Margin3.8%3.8%2.2%1.9%-1.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.520.520.610.680.82
Current Ratio0.870.87———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$991.8M$991.8M$891.2M$930.3M$-706.8M
Returns
ROE11.3%11.3%7.1%5.8%-3.4%
Valuation
P/E31.2531.25—80.19—
EV/EBITDA16.2116.2118.7222.4532.77
P/B3.553.554.274.694.85
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth2.9%2.9%8.9%6.6%—
EPS Growth———286.6%—
Dividend Yield0.6%0.6%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -6.9%

Total return

-6.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

-7.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.6%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-7.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.