StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8345.TWO$56.00+0.00%
Fair $56.00+0.0%

8345.TWO

Super Qin Enterprise Co., Ltd.

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsTaipei Exchange

$56.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $56.00Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $120.5M · quality 52.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 28/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 8345.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · Super Qin Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.9B

P/E

14.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

8.6x

↓

ROE

12.3%

↑

Gross Margin

16.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.17

↓
52-Week Range$56
$49$69

TradingView lightweight chart

8345.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $56.00Periodo -10.1%
Fair value: $56.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

6.5%

FCF / Net income

1.24x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.99B · net income $209.1M · FCF $259.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

16.6%— pts

Operating margin

6.5%— pts

Net margin

5.2%— pts

FCF margin

6.5%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.99B$3.99B$3.59B$3.76B—
Net Income$209.1M$209.1M$129.7M$140.7M—
EBITDA$354.1M$354.1M$236.5M$243.6M—
EPS——2.653.02—
Gross Margin16.6%16.6%14.6%14.6%—
Operating Margin6.5%6.5%4.3%4.2%—
Net Margin5.2%5.2%3.6%3.7%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.170.170.340.350.48
Current Ratio1.121.12———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$259.6M$259.6M$-138.2M$120.5M—
Returns
ROE12.3%12.3%8.7%11.3%—
Valuation
P/E14.0414.04———
EV/EBITDA8.618.61———
P/B1.711.71———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth11.1%11.1%-4.6%——
EPS Growth——-12.3%——
Dividend Yield2.3%2.3%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -7.8%

Total return

-7.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

2.65 → n/d

Residual

-10.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.3%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-10.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.