StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8529.HK$0.55+3.77%
Fair $0.55+0.0%

8529.HK

UBoT Holding Limited

Technology / SemiconductorsHKSE

$0.55

+0.02 (+3.77%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.55Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $4.6M · quality 45.3/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 28/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 8529.HKLocal privado en este navegador · UBoT Holding Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$283M

P/E

18.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

11.4x

↓

ROE

15.4%

↑

Gross Margin

37.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.03

↑
52-Week Range$1
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

8529.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.550Periodo +3.8%
Fair value: $0.550

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-8.1%

FCF CAGR

-38.1%

FCF margin

2.3%

FCF / Net income

0.36x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $199.7M · net income $12.8M · FCF $4.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

37.7%-1.8% pts

Operating margin

7.4%-11.5% pts

Net margin

6.4%-2.1% pts

FCF margin

2.3%-5.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$199.7M$199.7M$163.1M$189.0M$257.6M
Net Income$12.8M$12.8M$-23.2M$5.0M$21.8M
EBITDA$31.8M$31.8M$-3.7M$28.7M$46.9M
EPS——-0.050.010.04
Gross Margin37.7%37.7%34.5%38.1%39.6%
Operating Margin7.4%7.4%-2.6%9.7%18.9%
Net Margin6.4%6.4%-14.2%2.7%8.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.031.031.071.201.54
Current Ratio1.031.03———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$4.6M$4.6M$-40.2M$13.1M$19.4M
Returns
ROE15.4%15.4%-31.4%8.2%39.1%
Valuation
P/E18.3318.33———
EV/EBITDA11.4111.41———
P/B3.383.381.11——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth22.5%22.5%-13.7%-26.6%—
EPS Growth——-606.2%-76.9%—
Dividend Yield3.4%3.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +245.0%

Total return

+245.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.05 → n/d

Residual

+241.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+241.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.