StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8547.HK$0.14-1.39%
Fair $0.14+0.0%

8547.HK

Pacific Legend Group Limited

Consumer Cyclical / Furnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesHKSE

$0.14

-0.00 (-1.39%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.14Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-6.0M · quality 41.0/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 14/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 8547.HKLocal privado en este navegador · Pacific Legend Group Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$126M

P/E

3.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.1x

↓

ROE

15.8%

↑

Gross Margin

41.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.31

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

8547.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.142Periodo -95.3%
Fair value: $0.142

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+10.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-2.9%

FCF / Net income

-1.02x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $327.1M · net income $9.4M · FCF $-9.6M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

41.9%-11.8% pts

Operating margin

0.8%+7.2% pts

Net margin

2.9%+14.4% pts

FCF margin

-2.9%+5.2% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$327.1M$327.1M$250.6M$204.0M$244.3M
Net Income$9.4M$9.4M$-33.5M$-46.4M$-28.2M
EBITDA$12.6M$12.6M$-33.0M$-35.0M$-8.6M
EPS——-0.18-0.33-0.21
Gross Margin41.9%41.9%50.7%52.2%53.7%
Operating Margin0.8%0.8%-10.6%-11.7%-6.4%
Net Margin2.9%2.9%-13.4%-22.7%-11.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.310.310.810.770.23
Current Ratio1.801.80———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-9.6M$-9.6M$5.9M$-6.0M$-19.9M
Returns
ROE15.8%15.8%-90.4%-123.6%-33.3%
Valuation
P/E3.553.55———
EV/EBITDA4.054.05———
P/B0.700.700.932.310.74
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth30.6%30.6%22.8%-16.5%—
EPS Growth——43.6%-52.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -1.4%

Total return

-1.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.18 → n/d

Residual

-1.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-1.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.