StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8613.KL$0.63+0.00%
Fair $0.63+0.0%

8613.KL

ENRA Group Berhad

Industrials / ConglomeratesKuala Lumpur

$0.63

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.63Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-21.0M · quality 59.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 28/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 8613.KLLocal privado en este navegador · ENRA Group Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$106M

P/E

9.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.5x

↓

ROE

18.6%

↑

Gross Margin

20.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.63

↑
52-Week Range$1
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

8613.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.630Periodo -86.6%
Fair value: $0.630

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+63.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

5.3%

FCF / Net income

0.58x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $133.1M · net income $12.2M · FCF $7.0M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

20.9%+27.1% pts

Operating margin

11.1%+140.4% pts

Net margin

9.1%+92.7% pts

FCF margin

5.3%+58.1% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$133.1M$133.1M$30.4M$31.1M$30.5M
Net Income$12.2M$12.2M$-43.2M$-14.9M$-25.5M
EBITDA$28.9M$28.9M$-37.1M$-7.2M$-32.0M
EPS——-0.27-0.11-0.19
Gross Margin20.9%20.9%-41.4%0.5%-6.3%
Operating Margin11.1%11.1%-136.7%-44.5%-129.2%
Net Margin9.1%9.1%-142.2%-47.9%-83.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.630.630.880.480.18
Current Ratio1.711.71———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$7.0M$7.0M$-21.0M$-21.4M$-16.1M
Returns
ROE18.6%18.6%-90.0%-19.7%-29.2%
Valuation
P/E9.009.00———
EV/EBITDA4.544.54———
P/B1.621.622.951.251.15
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth338.0%338.0%-2.2%1.9%—
EPS Growth——-147.2%41.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -4.5%

Total return

-4.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.27 → n/d

Residual

-4.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-4.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.