StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8999.TWO$38.30+3.37%
Fair $38.30+0.0%

8999.TWO

8999.TWO

Consumer Cyclical / Packaging & ContainersTaipei Exchange

$38.30

+1.25 (+3.37%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $38.30Fund rank 38/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 42/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $98.5M · quality 81.7/100

Data gap 38/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 80/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

42/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 8999.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 8999.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.4B

P/E

16.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.0x

↓

ROE

7.2%

↑

Gross Margin

16.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.26

↓
52-Week Range$38
$37$45

TradingView lightweight chart

8999.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $38.30Periodo +30.3%
Fair value: $38.30

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.0%

FCF CAGR

-12.2%

FCF margin

5.1%

FCF / Net income

1.12x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.84B · net income $83.2M · FCF $92.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

16.9%-0.5% pts

Operating margin

5.3%+1.1% pts

Net margin

4.5%-0.6% pts

FCF margin

5.1%-3.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.84B$1.84B$1.78B$1.53B$1.68B
Net Income$83.2M$83.2M$83.9M$58.6M$86.9M
EBITDA$250.8M$250.8M$256.2M$223.8M$258.3M
EPS——2.611.862.75
Gross Margin16.9%16.9%17.5%16.5%17.4%
Operating Margin5.3%5.3%5.3%4.6%4.1%
Net Margin4.5%4.5%4.7%3.8%5.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.260.260.320.530.55
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$92.9M$92.9M$98.5M$135.7M$137.2M
Returns
ROE7.2%7.2%7.4%5.9%8.8%
Valuation
P/E16.7216.7211.26——
EV/EBITDA6.006.004.29——
P/B1.201.200.83——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth3.3%3.3%15.9%-8.7%—
EPS Growth——40.3%-32.4%—
Dividend Yield5.2%5.2%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -3.4%

Total return

-3.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

2.61 → n/d

Residual

-8.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+5.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-8.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.