StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9244.T$1077.00+2.57%
Fair $1077.00+0.0%

9244.T

DIGITALIFT Inc.

Communication Services / Advertising AgenciesTokyo

$1077.00

+27.00 (+2.57%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1077.00Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 52/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $83.2M · quality 44.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 41/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

52/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 9244.TLocal privado en este navegador · DIGITALIFT Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.5B

P/E

8.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.1x

↓

ROE

14.8%

↑

Gross Margin

32.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.28

↑
52-Week Range$1077
$702$1459

TradingView lightweight chart

9244.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,077Periodo -51.2%
Fair value: $1,077

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+9.8%

FCF CAGR

+22.4%

FCF margin

6.5%

FCF / Net income

2.09x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.49B · net income $108.1M · FCF $226.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

32.4%+4.5% pts

Operating margin

5.4%-1.7% pts

Net margin

3.1%-2.5% pts

FCF margin

6.5%+1.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.49B$3.49B$3.33B$3.56B$2.63B
Net Income$108.1M$108.1M$-74.1M$52.9M$148.0M
EBITDA$245.3M$245.3M$-5.4M$117.7M$203.3M
EPS——-52.1434.7893.06
Gross Margin32.4%32.4%22.9%23.4%28.0%
Operating Margin5.4%5.4%1.0%2.8%7.0%
Net Margin3.1%3.1%-2.2%1.5%5.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.281.281.971.040.43
Current Ratio1.591.59———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$226.4M$226.4M$-30.6M$83.2M$123.5M
Returns
ROE14.8%14.8%-11.9%7.7%19.2%
Valuation
P/E8.758.75—27.2310.90
EV/EBITDA4.124.12—7.794.30
P/B2.112.111.712.092.09
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth4.9%4.9%-6.6%35.2%—
EPS Growth——-249.9%-62.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +41.9%

Total return

+41.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-52.14 → n/d

Residual

+41.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+41.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.