StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9250.T$963.00-0.93%
Fair $963.00+0.0%

9250.T

GRCS Inc.

Technology / Information Technology ServicesTokyo

$963.00

-9.00 (-0.93%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $963.00Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 23/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-77.2M · quality 53.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 22/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

23/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 9250.TLocal privado en este navegador · GRCS Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.4B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

550.3%

↑

Gross Margin

28.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

-10.47

↓
52-Week Range$963
$901$2138

TradingView lightweight chart

9250.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $963.00Periodo -85.0%
Fair value: $963.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+11.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-2.3%

FCF / Net income

0.15x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.33B · net income $-527.9M · FCF $-77.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

28.6%+10.4% pts

Operating margin

-2.0%+5.8% pts

Net margin

-15.8%-7.1% pts

FCF margin

-2.3%+9.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.33B$3.33B$3.29B$2.78B$2.40B
Net Income$-527.9M$-527.9M$112.5M$-280.2M$-209.0M
EBITDA$-234.7M$-234.7M$142.0M$-118.9M$-169.7M
EPS——85.05-218.52-160.60
Gross Margin28.6%28.6%32.6%28.4%18.2%
Operating Margin-2.0%-2.0%1.3%-5.2%-7.8%
Net Margin-15.8%-15.8%3.4%-10.1%-8.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-10.47-10.471.573.851.28
Current Ratio1.051.05———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-77.2M$-77.2M$291.8M$-157.0M$-282.2M
Returns
ROE550.3%550.3%27.1%-162.0%-47.0%
Valuation
P/E——16.28——
EV/EBITDA——12.27——
P/B——4.4112.328.77
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.4%1.4%18.1%16.0%—
EPS Growth——138.9%-36.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -27.0%

Total return

-27.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

85.05 → n/d

Residual

-27.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-27.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.