StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9253.T$745.00+0.27%
Fair $745.00+0.0%

9253.T

Slogan Inc.

Industrials / Staffing & Employment ServicesTokyo

$745.00

+2.00 (+0.27%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $745.00Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $166.1M · quality 40.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 34/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 9253.TLocal privado en este navegador · Slogan Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.9B

P/E

10.2x

↓

EV/EBITDA

-0.5x

↓

ROE

11.6%

↑

Gross Margin

98.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$745
$628$964

TradingView lightweight chart

9253.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $745.00Periodo -51.1%
Fair value: $745.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+2.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

20.1%

FCF / Net income

1.68x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.59B · net income $189.6M · FCF $319.1M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

98.2%+1.6% pts

Operating margin

17.6%+3.4% pts

Net margin

11.9%+2.4% pts

FCF margin

20.1%+25.4% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.59B$1.59B$1.35B$1.42B$1.47B
Net Income$189.6M$189.6M$86.8M$91.4M$139.6M
EBITDA$284.9M$284.9M$125.0M$143.6M$209.1M
EPS———33.7351.34
Gross Margin98.2%98.2%97.7%95.5%96.6%
Operating Margin17.6%17.6%9.2%11.0%14.2%
Net Margin11.9%11.9%6.4%6.4%9.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity————0.00
Current Ratio3.113.11———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$319.1M$319.1M$166.1M$110.3M$-79.0M
Returns
ROE11.6%11.6%5.8%6.4%10.2%
Valuation
P/E10.2510.25—18.6515.60
EV/EBITDA-0.51-0.51-1.250.382.50
P/B1.141.141.051.191.59
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth17.8%17.8%-4.8%-3.6%—
EPS Growth———-34.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +15.0%

Total return

+15.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

+15.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+15.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.