StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9337.T$1645.00+3.72%
Fair $1645.00+0.0%

9337.T

toridori Inc.

Technology / Software - ApplicationTokyo

$1645.00

+59.00 (+3.72%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1645.00Fund rank 21/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 38/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 14%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-14.4M · quality 27.3/100

Data gap 21/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

38/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 9337.TLocal privado en este navegador · toridori Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$5.4B

P/E

12.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.6x

↓

ROE

23.8%

↑

Gross Margin

91.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.31

↑
52-Week Range$1645
$1480$3590

TradingView lightweight chart

9337.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,645Periodo -26.3%
Fair value: $1,645

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+37.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

0.8%

FCF / Net income

0.10x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $5.37B · net income $437.1M · FCF $43.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

91.1%-0.6% pts

Operating margin

13.2%+31.2% pts

Net margin

8.1%+35.6% pts

FCF margin

0.8%+23.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$5.37B$5.37B$4.27B$3.22B$2.05B
Net Income$437.1M$437.1M$258.8M$133.7M$-565.2M
EBITDA$886.7M$886.7M$526.9M$145.1M$-515.7M
EPS——77.1443.18-203.41
Gross Margin91.1%91.1%91.6%94.1%91.7%
Operating Margin13.2%13.2%10.6%3.8%-18.0%
Net Margin8.1%8.1%6.1%4.1%-27.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.311.311.230.830.33
Current Ratio1.261.26———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$43.8M$43.8M$-14.4M$-35.3M$-465.8M
Returns
ROE23.8%23.8%18.2%11.2%-53.5%
Valuation
P/E12.6912.6928.9260.63—
EV/EBITDA6.636.6314.5351.11—
P/B2.962.965.276.814.51
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth25.7%25.7%32.6%56.8%—
EPS Growth——78.6%121.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -15.3%

Total return

-15.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

77.14 → n/d

Residual

-15.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-15.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.