StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9376.T$758.00-1.04%
Fair $758.00+0.0%

9376.T

Eurasia Travel Co., Ltd.

Consumer Cyclical / Travel ServicesTokyo

$758.00

-8.00 (-1.04%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $758.00Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $144.5M · quality 38.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 35/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 9376.TLocal privado en este navegador · Eurasia Travel Co., Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.8B

P/E

49.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

6.5x

↓

ROE

6.2%

↑

Gross Margin

18.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$758
$485$997

TradingView lightweight chart

9376.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $758.00Periodo -14.7%
Fair value: $758.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+112.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

2.7%

FCF / Net income

1.13x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.79B · net income $113.9M · FCF $128.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

18.9%+0.4% pts

Operating margin

2.4%+82.4% pts

Net margin

2.4%+27.0% pts

FCF margin

2.7%+32.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$4.79B$4.79B$4.60B$2.95B$502.1M
Net Income$113.9M$113.9M$120.6M$-56.0M$-123.7M
EBITDA$123.6M$123.6M$112.0M$-116.7M$-396.1M
EPS———-15.17-33.53
Gross Margin18.9%18.9%16.9%15.8%18.4%
Operating Margin2.4%2.4%2.3%-4.1%-80.0%
Net Margin2.4%2.4%2.6%-1.9%-24.6%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio2.202.20———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$128.3M$128.3M$335.4M$144.5M$-150.0M
Returns
ROE6.2%6.2%6.9%-3.3%-7.2%
Valuation
P/E49.4849.48———
EV/EBITDA6.526.52-0.60——
P/B1.521.521.060.980.98
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth4.1%4.1%56.1%486.7%—
EPS Growth———54.8%—
Dividend Yield6.5%6.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +61.2%

Total return

+61.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

+54.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+6.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+54.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.