StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9385.KL$0.26+1.96%
Fair $0.26+0.0%

9385.KL

Lay Hong Berhad

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsKuala Lumpur

$0.26

+0.00 (+1.96%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.26Fund rank 37/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 42/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $89.0M · quality 78.3/100

Data gap 37/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 74/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

42/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 9385.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Lay Hong Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$197M

P/E

3.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.2x

↓

ROE

7.8%

↑

Gross Margin

22.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.23

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

9385.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.260Periodo -15.6%
Fair value: $0.260

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.7%

FCF CAGR

-16.8%

FCF margin

3.8%

FCF / Net income

0.66x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.12B · net income $64.5M · FCF $42.7M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

22.8%+6.7% pts

Operating margin

8.1%+3.2% pts

Net margin

5.7%+3.1% pts

FCF margin

3.8%-3.1% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.12B$1.12B$1.07B$1.04B$1.07B
Net Income$64.5M$64.5M$86.8M$90.3M$28.1M
EBITDA$142.8M$142.8M$173.3M$180.5M$98.9M
EPS——0.110.110.04
Gross Margin22.8%22.8%24.8%25.2%16.1%
Operating Margin8.1%8.1%11.3%12.6%4.8%
Net Margin5.7%5.7%8.1%8.7%2.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.230.230.320.410.52
Current Ratio1.611.61———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$42.7M$42.7M$89.0M$93.5M$74.2M
Returns
ROE7.8%7.8%13.5%16.1%6.1%
Valuation
P/E3.253.253.053.718.16
EV/EBITDA2.172.172.382.814.42
P/B0.240.240.410.600.50
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth4.8%4.8%3.0%-2.5%—
EPS Growth——-3.5%194.7%—
Dividend Yield1.5%1.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -20.8%

Total return

-20.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.11 → n/d

Residual

-22.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-22.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.