StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9590.SR$60.00+0.00%
Fair $60.00+0.0%

9590.SR

9590.SR

Consumer Cyclical / LeisureSaudi

$60.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $60.00Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $51.6M · quality 45.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 9590.SRLocal privado en este navegador · 9590.SR
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.0B

P/E

31.7x

↑

EV/EBITDA

17.8x

↑

ROE

11.2%

↑

Gross Margin

49.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.77

↑
52-Week Range$60
$57$88

TradingView lightweight chart

9590.SR price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $60.00Periodo +110.5%
Fair value: $60.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+157.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

30.3%

FCF / Net income

1.10x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $224.9M · net income $62.0M · FCF $68.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

49.3%+63.5% pts

Operating margin

34.2%+193.2% pts

Net margin

27.6%+218.9% pts

FCF margin

30.3%+865.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$224.9M$224.9M$177.5M$80.1M$13.2M
Net Income$62.0M$62.0M$38.3M$762227.00$-25.2M
EBITDA$130.2M$130.2M$99.3M$33.0M$-9.4M
EPS——1.160.03-0.77
Gross Margin49.3%49.3%47.3%35.5%-14.1%
Operating Margin34.2%34.2%32.4%17.9%-159.0%
Net Margin27.6%27.6%21.6%1.0%-191.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.770.770.901.011.19
Current Ratio0.510.51———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$68.1M$68.1M$51.6M$-53.2M$-110.2M
Returns
ROE11.2%11.2%8.1%0.2%-10.2%
Valuation
P/E31.7531.7576.121603.33—
EV/EBITDA17.8017.8033.0552.97—
P/B3.573.576.163.78—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth26.7%26.7%121.5%507.2%—
EPS Growth——3766.7%103.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -31.0%

Total return

-31.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.16 → n/d

Residual

-31.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-31.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.