StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9598.SR$27.98+0.00%
Fair $27.98+0.0%

9598.SR

9598.SR

Consumer Defensive / Education & Training ServicesSaudi

$27.98

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $27.98Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-10.0M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 9598.SRLocal privado en este navegador · 9598.SR
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$224M

P/E

45.9x

↑

EV/EBITDA

22.6x

↑

ROE

5.2%

↓

Gross Margin

37.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$28
$21$29

TradingView lightweight chart

9598.SR price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $27.98Periodo +45.9%
Fair value: $27.98

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+2.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-60.0%

FCF / Net income

-2.83x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $27.6M · net income $5.9M · FCF $-16.6M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

37.6%-0.9% pts

Operating margin

14.0%-5.1% pts

Net margin

21.2%-3.3% pts

FCF margin

-60.0%-85.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$27.6M$27.6M$29.1M$26.1M
Net Income$5.9M$5.9M$9.4M$6.4M
EBITDA$9.5M$9.5M$13.8M$10.5M
EPS0.730.731.310.95
Gross Margin37.6%37.6%44.4%38.5%
Operating Margin14.0%14.0%24.8%19.1%
Net Margin21.2%21.2%32.3%24.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.030.04
Current Ratio8.018.01——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-16.6M$-16.6M$-10.0M$6.6M
Returns
ROE5.2%5.2%8.6%8.3%
Valuation
P/E45.8745.8716.79—
EV/EBITDA22.5922.5910.72—
P/B2.002.001.43—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-5.1%-5.1%11.4%—
EPS Growth-44.3%-44.3%37.3%—
Dividend Yield1.8%1.8%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

50.4%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$2.48

Spread vs growth

-94.7%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

32.7%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$3.00

Spread vs growth

-77.0%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

20.8%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$4.84

Spread vs growth

-65.1%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +26.7%

Total return

+26.7%

Start / end P/E

17.1x → 38.3x

EPS bridge

1.31 → 0.73

Residual

-55.0%

EPS growth-44.3%
Multiple rerating+124.2%
Dividend+1.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-55.0%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.