StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9617.SR$28.38-0.35%
Fair $28.38+0.0%

9617.SR

9617.SR

Consumer Cyclical / RestaurantsSaudi

$28.38

-0.10 (-0.35%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $28.38Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 19/F
F-Score: 2/9
Declining RevenueLow Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $4.4M · quality 66.3/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 52/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

19/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 2unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. Revenue has declined for 2 consecutive years ROE is -8.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 9617.SRLocal privado en este navegador · 9617.SR
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$39M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-8.6%

↓

Gross Margin

16.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.14

↓
52-Week Range$28
$28$60

TradingView lightweight chart

9617.SR price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $28.38Periodo -65.9%
Fair value: $28.38

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-9.8%

FCF CAGR

-79.3%

FCF margin

0.6%

FCF / Net income

-0.10x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $50.1M · net income $-3.1M · FCF $304902.0

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

16.5%-6.4% pts

Operating margin

-1.1%-14.5% pts

Net margin

-6.2%-13.9% pts

FCF margin

0.6%-11.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$50.1M$50.1M$54.2M$61.5M
Net Income$-3.1M$-3.1M$4.4M$4.7M
EBITDA$10.8M$10.8M$17.8M$19.7M
EPS——3.863.44
Gross Margin16.5%16.5%26.1%22.9%
Operating Margin-1.1%-1.1%12.4%13.5%
Net Margin-6.2%-6.2%8.1%7.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.140.140.141.85
Current Ratio0.330.33——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$304902.00$304902.00$4.4M$7.1M
Returns
ROE-8.6%-8.6%11.1%23.6%
Valuation
P/E——19.72—
EV/EBITDA——4.55—
P/B——2.19—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-7.6%-7.6%-11.9%—
EPS Growth——12.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -51.6%

Total return

-51.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

3.86 → n/d

Residual

-51.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-51.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.