StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9635.SR$59.75+1.36%
Fair $59.75+0.0%

9635.SR

9635.SR

Consumer Defensive / Household & Personal ProductsSaudi

$59.75

+0.80 (+1.36%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $59.75Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 38/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $10.0M · quality 59.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 59/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

38/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 0unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 9635.SRLocal privado en este navegador · 9635.SR
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$120M

P/E

15.9x

↑

EV/EBITDA

7.7x

↓

ROE

11.6%

↑

Gross Margin

66.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.76

↑
52-Week Range$60
$51$100

TradingView lightweight chart

9635.SR price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $59.75Periodo -40.6%
Fair value: $59.75

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2024–2025 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.9%

FCF CAGR

-65.9%

FCF margin

6.4%

FCF / Net income

0.68x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $80.1M · net income $7.5M · FCF $5.1M

2024-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

66.9%-4.9% pts

Operating margin

13.4%-8.9% pts

Net margin

9.4%-9.7% pts

FCF margin

6.4%-13.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
Income Statement
Revenue$80.1M$80.1M$74.9M
Net Income$7.5M$7.5M$14.3M
EBITDA$20.0M$20.0M$25.5M
EPS3.753.757.14
Gross Margin66.9%66.9%71.8%
Operating Margin13.4%13.4%22.4%
Net Margin9.4%9.4%19.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.760.760.76
Current Ratio3.933.93—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$5.1M$5.1M$14.9M
Returns
ROE11.6%11.6%25.2%
Valuation
P/E15.9315.93—
EV/EBITDA7.747.74—
P/B1.861.86—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth6.9%6.9%—
EPS Growth-47.5%-47.5%—
Dividend Yield5.1%5.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

12.2%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$5.30

Spread vs growth

-59.7%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

11.3%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$6.42

Spread vs growth

-58.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

10.7%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$10.33

Spread vs growth

-58.1%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -33.6%

Total return

-33.6%

Start / end P/E

13.7x → 15.9x

EPS bridge

7.14 → 3.75

Residual

-7.9%

EPS growth-47.5%
Multiple rerating+16.6%
Dividend+5.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-7.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.