StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9641.SR$13.65+5.00%
Fair $13.65+0.0%

9641.SR

9641.SR

Real Estate / Real Estate ServicesSaudi

$13.65

+0.65 (+5.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $13.65Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 2/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 100.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 60/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 0unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Sector-specific NAV/AFFO model required: REIT/real-estate targets are disabled until FFO/AFFO/NAV/cap-rate data exists. REIT NAV/AFFO valuation requires positive AFFO/share history or TTM AFFO/share; generic FCF remains disabled.
Thesis & Journal · 9641.SRLocal privado en este navegador · 9641.SR
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$273M

P/E

9.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.8x

↓

ROE

51.0%

↑

Gross Margin

38.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$14
$12$15

TradingView lightweight chart

9641.SR price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $13.65Periodo +1.3%
Fair value: $13.65

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2024–2025 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+29.6%

FCF CAGR

+42.5%

FCF margin

26.8%

FCF / Net income

0.77x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $81.1M · net income $28.3M · FCF $21.8M

2024-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

38.8%-5.0% pts

Operating margin

34.6%-5.1% pts

Net margin

34.8%-5.2% pts

FCF margin

26.8%+2.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
Income Statement
Revenue$81.1M$81.1M$62.6M
Net Income$28.3M$28.3M$25.1M
EBITDA$29.7M$29.7M$25.8M
EPS——1.25
Gross Margin38.8%38.8%43.8%
Operating Margin34.6%34.6%39.6%
Net Margin34.8%34.8%40.1%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio5.315.31—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$21.8M$21.8M$15.3M
Returns
ROE51.0%51.0%92.4%
Valuation
P/E9.689.68—
EV/EBITDA7.767.76—
P/B4.934.93—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth29.6%29.6%—
Dividend Yield3.9%3.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +5.1%

Total return

+5.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.25 → n/d

Residual

+1.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+1.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.