StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9993.T$1156.00+0.00%
Fair $1156.00+0.0%

9993.T

Yamazawa Co., Ltd.

Consumer Defensive / Grocery StoresTokyo

$1156.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1156.00Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 49/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $717.0M · quality 39.7/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 6/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

49/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 9993.TLocal privado en este navegador · Yamazawa Co., Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$11.9B

P/E

9.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.9x

↓

ROE

5.2%

↓

Gross Margin

28.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.36

↓
52-Week Range$1156
$1111$1220

TradingView lightweight chart

9993.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,156Periodo +0.5%
Fair value: $1,156

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+2.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

4.6%

FCF / Net income

3.54x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $105.41B · net income $1.38B · FCF $4.88B

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

28.1%+0.4% pts

Operating margin

1.1%+0.4% pts

Net margin

1.3%+1.1% pts

FCF margin

4.6%+9.0% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$105.41B$105.41B$102.56B$101.89B$99.46B
Net Income$1.38B$1.38B$-2.62B$451.0M$205.0M
EBITDA$5.53B$5.53B$1.73B$3.62B$3.47B
EPS———41.8918.88
Gross Margin28.1%28.1%27.9%27.6%27.8%
Operating Margin1.1%1.1%-0.8%0.6%0.7%
Net Margin1.3%1.3%-2.6%0.4%0.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.360.360.590.540.36
Current Ratio0.840.84———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$4.88B$4.88B$717.0M$-2.79B$-4.37B
Returns
ROE5.2%5.2%-10.1%1.6%0.7%
Valuation
P/E8.988.98—29.8468.22
EV/EBITDA2.912.9112.506.365.50
P/B0.440.440.460.470.49
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth2.8%2.8%0.7%2.4%—
EPS Growth———121.9%—
Dividend Yield2.3%2.3%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +3.9%

Total return

+3.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

+1.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.3%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+1.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.