StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
9MT.SI$0.84-1.18%
Fair $0.84+0.0%

9MT.SI

9MT.SI

Technology / Computer HardwareSES

$0.84

-0.01 (-1.18%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.84Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 23/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.3M · quality 68.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 32/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

23/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -54.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 9MT.SILocal privado en este navegador · 9MT.SI
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$204M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-54.2%

↓

Gross Margin

18.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$1
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

9MT.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.840Periodo +250.0%
Fair value: $0.840

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+128.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-576.3%

FCF / Net income

0.83x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $787388.0 · net income $-5.4M · FCF $-4.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

18.4%+11.8% pts

Operating margin

-669.6%+1002.3% pts

Net margin

-691.6%+973.9% pts

FCF margin

-576.3%+46.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$787388.00$787388.00$79440.00—$65760.00
Net Income$-5.4M$-5.4M$-2.0M$-1.2M$-1.1M
EBITDA$-4.5M$-4.5M$-1.2M$-658255.00$-529087.00
EPS——-0.01-0.01-0.00
Gross Margin18.4%18.4%20.9%—6.6%
Operating Margin-669.6%-669.6%-2459.7%—-1672.0%
Net Margin-691.6%-691.6%-2455.8%—-1665.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.01——
Current Ratio6.796.79———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-4.5M$-4.5M$-1.3M$-623048.00$-409600.00
Returns
ROE-54.2%-54.2%-62.9%-47.2%-48.1%
Valuation
P/B20.2920.29———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth891.2%891.2%———
EPS Growth——-58.6%-12.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +250.0%

Total return

+250.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → n/d

Residual

+250.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+250.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.