StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ABXX.NE$59.06-1.53%
Fair $59.06+0.0%

ABXX.NE

Abaxx Technologies Inc

Technology / Software - ApplicationCboe CA

$59.06

-1.00 (-1.53%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $59.06Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 35/D
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-30.3M · quality 69.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 34/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

35/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -47.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ABXX.NELocal privado en este navegador · Abaxx Technologies Inc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.2B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-47.1%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.26

↑
52-Week Range$59
$11$70

TradingView lightweight chart

ABXX.NE price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $65.50Periodo +445.8%
Fair value: $59.06

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-4081.7%

FCF / Net income

0.97x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.0M · net income $-43.9M · FCF $-42.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

-5636.8%— pts

Net margin

-4202.3%— pts

FCF margin

-4081.7%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.0M$1.0M$968848.00$215510.00—
Net Income$-43.9M$-43.9M$-54.1M$-9.6M$-17.0M
EBITDA$-39.0M$-39.0M$-56.5M$-31.1M$-19.9M
EPS——-1.65-0.38-0.69
Operating Margin-5636.8%-5636.8%-5050.4%-14428.0%—
Net Margin-4202.3%-4202.3%-5581.4%-4469.0%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.260.26———
Current Ratio3.403.40———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-42.6M$-42.6M$-30.3M$-22.5M$-15.3M
Returns
ROE-47.1%-47.1%-107.6%-19.8%-115.4%
Valuation
P/B23.2023.207.857.0112.36
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth7.8%7.8%349.6%——
EPS Growth——-334.2%44.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +475.9%

Total return

+475.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.65 → n/d

Residual

+475.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+475.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.