StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ACU.V$0.01+0.00%
Fair $0.01+0.0%

ACU.V

Aurora Solar Technologies Inc.

Technology / SolarTSXV

$0.01

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.01Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 13/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.1M · quality 61.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 25/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

13/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -1.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ACU.VLocal privado en este navegador · Aurora Solar Technologies Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-109.1%

↓

Gross Margin

57.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.27

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

ACU.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.005Periodo -98.5%
Fair value: $0.005

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-32.9%

FCF / Net income

0.64x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $6.3M · net income $-3.2M · FCF $-2.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

57.2%— pts

Operating margin

-30.2%— pts

Net margin

-51.2%— pts

FCF margin

-32.9%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$6.3M$6.3M$10.9M$5.5M—
Net Income$-3.2M$-3.2M$-217637.00$-4.5M$-4.2M
EBITDA$-2.6M$-2.6M$179086.00$-4.2M$-4.1M
EPS-0.01-0.01—-0.02-0.03
Gross Margin57.2%57.2%56.9%50.0%—
Operating Margin-30.2%-30.2%-4.1%-63.3%—
Net Margin-51.2%-51.2%-2.0%-81.3%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.270.270.060.060.13
Current Ratio1.021.02———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.1M$-2.1M$35568.00$-2.5M$-4.0M
Returns
ROE-109.1%-109.1%-3.7%-79.9%-171.5%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA——48.06——
P/B0.380.381.911.375.77
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-42.3%-42.3%98.1%——
EPS Growth———33.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -66.7%

Total return

-66.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → -0.01

Residual

-66.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-66.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.