StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ADGM$0.77+6.35%
Fair $0.77+0.0%

ADGM

Adagio Medical Holdings, Inc.

Healthcare / Medical DevicesNasdaqCM

$0.77

+0.05 (+6.35%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.77Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 8/F
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-22.7M · quality 61.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 45/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

8/100

F

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 5Warnings: 1unknown: 5
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is -2.0%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ADGMLocal privado en este navegador · Adagio Medical Holdings, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$17M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-202.3%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

1.75

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

ADGM price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.770Periodo -91.5%
Fair value: $0.770

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

0.77x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-25.1M · FCF $-19.4M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue———$300000.00$189000.00$270000.00
Net Income$-25.1M$-25.1M—$-38.1M$-23.7M$-19.9M
EBITDA$-21.2M$-21.2M—$-36.0M$-23.0M$-19.6M
EPS———-2.85-1.77-1.49
Gross Margin———-335.3%-363.0%-328.9%
Operating Margin———-9314.0%-12652.4%-7646.3%
Net Margin———-12715.3%-12525.4%-7384.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.751.750.82-0.29-0.10—
Current Ratio1.851.85————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-19.4M$-19.4M—$-26.0M$-22.9M$-20.6M
Returns
ROE-202.3%-202.3%—28.9%24.7%—
Valuation
P/B1.381.380.85———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth———58.7%-30.0%—
EPS Growth———-61.1%-18.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -31.9%

Total return

-31.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

-31.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-31.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.