StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ADVICE-R.BK$6.35-3.79%
Fair $6.35+0.0%

ADVICE-R.BK

ADVICE-R.BK

Technology / Electronics & Computer DistributionThailand

$6.35

-0.25 (-3.79%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $6.35Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $136.4M · quality 43.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 17/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ADVICE-R.BKLocal privado en este navegador · ADVICE-R.BK
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$3.9B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

8.4x

↓

ROE

26.9%

↑

Gross Margin

10.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.38

↑
52-Week Range$6
$4$7

TradingView lightweight chart

ADVICE-R.BK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $6.350Periodo +21.0%
Fair value: $6.350

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

0.8%

FCF / Net income

0.51x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $16.58B · net income $267.1M · FCF $136.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

10.3%+1.8% pts

Operating margin

2.1%+0.2% pts

Net margin

1.6%+0.2% pts

FCF margin

0.8%+1.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$16.58B$16.58B$14.21B$13.51B$14.39B
Net Income$267.1M$267.1M$232.5M$170.2M$205.7M
EBITDA$486.2M$486.2M$428.8M$366.7M$401.7M
EPS——0.380.270.33
Gross Margin10.3%10.3%10.3%8.7%8.5%
Operating Margin2.1%2.1%2.1%1.8%1.9%
Net Margin1.6%1.6%1.6%1.3%1.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.380.380.191.701.75
Current Ratio1.121.12———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$136.4M$136.4M$-21.6M$235.2M$-51.2M
Returns
ROE26.9%26.9%24.7%54.8%66.2%
Valuation
P/E——15.79——
EV/EBITDA8.428.428.48——
P/B3.973.973.88——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth16.7%16.7%5.1%-6.1%—
EPS Growth——38.4%-17.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +30.1%

Total return

+30.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.38 → n/d

Residual

+30.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+30.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.