StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AEBI$12.31-1.56%
Fair $12.31+0.0%

AEBI

Aebi Schmidt Holding AG

Industrials / Farm & Heavy Construction MachineryNasdaqGS

$12.31

-0.20 (-1.56%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $12.31Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 30/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $18.2M · quality 48.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 38/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

30/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is 1.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · AEBILocal privado en este navegador · Aebi Schmidt Holding AG
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$954M

P/E

112.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

16.5x

↑

ROE

1.2%

↓

Gross Margin

19.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.93

↑
52-Week Range$12
$9$33

TradingView lightweight chart

AEBI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $12.31Periodo +10.2%
Fair value: $12.31

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+22.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-0.3%

FCF / Net income

-0.54x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.53B · net income $9.7M · FCF $-5.3M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

19.9%-0.4% pts

Operating margin

4.8%-1.0% pts

Net margin

0.6%-0.5% pts

FCF margin

-0.3%-2.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.53B$1.53B$1.09B$1.02B
Net Income$9.7M$9.7M$30.7M$11.2M
EBITDA$97.2M$97.2M$102.2M$82.5M
EPS——0.400.14
Gross Margin19.9%19.9%21.0%20.3%
Operating Margin4.8%4.8%6.3%5.8%
Net Margin0.6%0.6%2.8%1.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.930.931.271.51
Current Ratio1.991.99——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-5.3M$-5.3M$55.2M$18.2M
Returns
ROE1.2%1.2%8.4%3.3%
Valuation
P/E111.95111.95——
EV/EBITDA16.5516.55——
P/B1.161.16——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth40.6%40.6%6.9%—
EPS Growth——174.0%—
Dividend Yield0.8%0.8%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +11.0%

Total return

+11.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.40 → n/d

Residual

+10.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+10.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.