StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AEI.AX$0.04+5.41%
Fair $0.04+0.0%

AEI.AX

Aeris Environmental Ltd

Industrials / Pollution & Treatment ControlsASX

$0.04

+0.00 (+5.41%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.04Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 27/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.7M · quality 63.3/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 27/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

27/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · AEI.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Aeris Environmental Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$10M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

10808.8%

↑

Gross Margin

55.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

-33.34

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

AEI.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.039Periodo -80.5%
Fair value: $0.039

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-24.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-66.9%

FCF / Net income

0.69x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.0M · net income $-3.0M · FCF $-2.0M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

55.3%+16.7% pts

Operating margin

-95.7%-26.4% pts

Net margin

-97.6%-15.3% pts

FCF margin

-66.9%-47.6% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$3.0M$3.0M$1.9M$2.7M$7.1M
Net Income$-3.0M$-3.0M$-3.7M$-7.1M$-5.9M
EBITDA$-3.0M$-3.0M$-3.9M$-7.3M$-5.8M
EPS-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.03-0.02
Gross Margin55.3%55.3%49.1%45.0%38.6%
Operating Margin-95.7%-95.7%-199.7%-222.0%-69.3%
Net Margin-97.6%-97.6%-189.3%-266.2%-82.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-33.34-33.340.04—0.02
Current Ratio1.901.90———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.0M$-2.0M$-2.7M$-6.2M$-1.4M
Returns
ROE10808.8%10808.8%-123.8%-108.2%-43.6%
Valuation
P/B——1.831.893.07
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth57.8%57.8%-27.9%-62.4%—
EPS Growth18.8%18.8%49.0%-21.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +2.6%

Total return

+2.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → -0.01

Residual

+2.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+2.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.