StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AEM.AT$5.38-0.37%
Fair $5.38+0.0%

AEM.AT

AEM.AT

Communication Services / Advertising AgenciesAthens

$5.38

-0.02 (-0.37%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $5.38Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 60/B
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $4.2M · quality 64.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 50/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

60/100

B

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 0unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · AEM.ATLocal privado en este navegador · AEM.AT
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$315M

P/E

15.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.1x

↓

ROE

13.7%

↑

Gross Margin

36.0%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.09

↓
52-Week Range$5
$4$7

TradingView lightweight chart

AEM.AT price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $5.380Periodo +20.9%
Fair value: $5.380

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2024–2025 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+12.6%

FCF CAGR

+563.8%

FCF margin

5.3%

FCF / Net income

0.38x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $140.1M · net income $19.7M · FCF $7.4M

2024-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

36.0%+8.3% pts

Operating margin

20.8%+7.0% pts

Net margin

14.0%+5.3% pts

FCF margin

5.3%+4.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
Income Statement
Revenue$140.1M$140.1M$124.4M
Net Income$19.7M$19.7M$10.9M
EBITDA$54.2M$54.2M$46.5M
EPS0.350.350.19
Gross Margin36.0%36.0%27.6%
Operating Margin20.8%20.8%13.8%
Net Margin14.0%14.0%8.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.090.090.17
Current Ratio1.521.52—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$7.4M$7.4M$1.1M
Returns
ROE13.7%13.7%15.3%
Valuation
P/E15.3715.37—
EV/EBITDA5.065.06—
P/B2.122.12—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth12.6%12.6%—
EPS Growth83.4%83.4%—
Dividend Yield1.7%1.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

10.9%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$0.48

Spread vs growth

72.5%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

10.5%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$0.58

Spread vs growth

72.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

10.3%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$0.93

Spread vs growth

73.1%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +30.4%

Total return

+30.4%

Start / end P/E

21.9x → 15.4x

EPS bridge

0.19 → 0.35

Residual

-24.8%

EPS growth+83.4%
Multiple rerating-29.8%
Dividend+1.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-24.8%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.