StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AET.L$70.50-2.08%
Fair $70.50+0.0%

AET.L

Afentra plc

Energy / Oil & Gas E&PLSE

$70.50

-1.50 (-2.08%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $70.50Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 31/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $9.0M · quality 49.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 32/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

31/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -3.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · AET.LLocal privado en este navegador · Afentra plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$156M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

411.6x

↑

ROE

-3.4%

↓

Gross Margin

38.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.34

↑
52-Week Range$71
$37$89

TradingView lightweight chart

AET.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $70.50Periodo -84.7%
Fair value: $70.50

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-17.7%

FCF / Net income

6.35x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $114.4M · net income $-3.2M · FCF $-20.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

38.1%— pts

Operating margin

24.7%— pts

Net margin

-2.8%— pts

FCF margin

-17.7%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$114.4M$114.4M$180.9M$26.4M—
Net Income$-3.2M$-3.2M$52.4M$-2.7M$-9.1M
EBITDA$42.9M$42.9M$86.5M$3.8M$-8.8M
EPS-0.01-0.010.21-0.01-0.04
Gross Margin38.1%38.1%48.0%52.4%—
Operating Margin24.7%24.7%41.2%9.0%—
Net Margin-2.8%-2.8%28.9%-10.3%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.340.340.430.660.01
Current Ratio0.840.84———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-20.2M$-20.2M$65.0M$9.0M$-6.9M
Returns
ROE-3.4%-3.4%53.1%-5.6%-18.2%
Valuation
P/E——218.01——
EV/EBITDA411.63411.63132.122207.11—
P/B187.79187.79115.86172.45111.23
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-36.8%-36.8%585.3%——
EPS Growth-106.6%-106.6%1858.3%70.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +56.7%

Total return

+56.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.21 → -0.01

Residual

+56.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+56.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.