StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AEWU.L$109.00+3.42%
Fair $109.00+0.0%

AEWU.L

AEW UK REIT Ord

Unknown / UnknownLSE

$109.00

+3.60 (+3.42%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $109.00Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 35/D
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $9.8M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 49/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

35/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific NAV/AFFO model required: REIT/real-estate targets are disabled until FFO/AFFO/NAV/cap-rate data exists. REIT NAV/AFFO valuation requires positive AFFO/share history or TTM AFFO/share; generic FCF remains disabled.
Thesis & Journal · AEWU.LLocal privado en este navegador · AEW UK REIT Ord
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$173M

P/E

13.6x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

14.0%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.34

↑
52-Week Range$109
$96$113

TradingView lightweight chart

AEWU.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $109.00Periodo +8.2%
Fair value: $109.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-16.4%

FCF CAGR

-11.1%

FCF margin

27.6%

FCF / Net income

0.36x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $31.3M · net income $24.3M · FCF $8.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

77.8%-9.5% pts

FCF margin

27.6%+4.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$31.3M$31.3M$18.8M$-2.9M$53.5M
Net Income$24.3M$24.3M$9.0M$-11.3M$46.7M
EPS0.150.150.06-0.070.29
Net Margin77.8%77.8%48.1%392.7%87.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.340.340.370.360.28
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$8.6M$8.6M$11.7M$9.8M$12.3M
Returns
ROE14.0%14.0%5.6%-6.8%24.4%
Valuation
P/E13.6313.631462.35—411.94
P/B98.9998.9981.2888.46100.64
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth66.4%66.4%752.2%-105.4%—
EPS Growth169.2%169.2%179.9%-124.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

297.8%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$9.67

Spread vs growth

-128.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

137.9%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$11.70

Spread vs growth

31.3%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

61.8%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$18.85

Spread vs growth

107.4%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +6.0%

Total return

+6.0%

Start / end P/E

1800.4x → 709.2x

EPS bridge

0.06 → 0.15

Residual

-102.5%

EPS growth+169.2%
Multiple rerating-60.6%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-102.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.