StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AGYO.IS$8.92+0.00%
Fair $8.92+0.0%

AGYO.IS

AGYO.IS

Real Estate / REIT - RetailIstanbul

$8.92

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $8.92Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF n/d · quality 53.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 52/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

n/d

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

4/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 1Warnings: 0unknown: 1
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Sector-specific NAV/AFFO model required: REIT/real-estate targets are disabled until FFO/AFFO/NAV/cap-rate data exists. Missing current price or market-cap data; cannot run NAV/AFFO REIT valuation.
Thesis & Journal · AGYO.ISLocal privado en este navegador · AGYO.IS
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$0

P/E

29.7x

↑

EV/EBITDA

36.1x

↑

ROE

13.3%

↑

Gross Margin

50.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$9
$6$10

TradingView lightweight chart

AGYO.IS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $9.120Periodo +2371.7%
Fair value: $8.920

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2021 · 0 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

15.6%

FCF / Net income

0.07x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $34.7M · net income $80.6M · FCF $5.4M

2021-FY → 2021-FY

Gross margin

50.6%+0.0% pts

Operating margin

6.0%+0.0% pts

Net margin

232.4%+0.0% pts

FCF margin

15.6%+0.0% pts
MetricTTM
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$34.7M$34.7M
Net Income$80.6M$80.6M
EBITDA$82.3M$82.3M
EPS0.240.24
Gross Margin50.6%50.6%
Operating Margin6.0%6.0%
Net Margin232.4%232.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.00
Current Ratio2.652.65
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$5.4M$5.4M
Returns
ROE13.3%13.3%
Valuation
P/E29.7329.73
EV/EBITDA36.1436.14
P/B4.934.93

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

48.6%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.79

Spread vs growth

n/d

5Y implied EPS CAGR

31.8%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.96

Spread vs growth

n/d

10Y implied EPS CAGR

20.4%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$1.54

Spread vs growth

n/d

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +48.3%

Total return

+48.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → 0.24

Residual

+48.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+48.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.