StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AIOS$15.88+0.13%
Fair $15.88+0.0%

AIOS

AIOS Tech Inc.

Technology / Information Technology ServicesNasdaqCM

$15.88

+0.02 (+0.13%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $15.88Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-29.7M · quality 60.3/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 29/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 2.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · AIOSLocal privado en este navegador · AIOS Tech Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$51M

P/E

0.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

2.8%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.03

↓
52-Week Range$16
$7$98

TradingView lightweight chart

AIOS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $15.88Periodo -98.6%
Fair value: $15.88

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

-13.08x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $5.8M · FCF $-75.7M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue———$234.2M$160.2M
Net Income$5.8M$5.8M$17.6M$17.6M$30.4M
EBITDA$-8.2M$-8.2M$1.8M$25.1M$40.7M
EPS28.6028.6089.2088.40282.60
Gross Margin———15.8%33.7%
Operating Margin———9.8%24.0%
Net Margin———7.5%19.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.030.030.020.060.07
Current Ratio12.2612.26———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-75.7M$-75.7M$35.0M$-29.7M$23.7M
Returns
ROE2.8%2.8%8.8%9.5%16.8%
Valuation
P/E0.560.560.901.291.91
EV/EBITDA——-53.45-1.16-0.53
P/B0.020.020.080.120.32
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth———46.2%—
EPS Growth-67.9%-67.9%0.9%-68.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-63.3%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$1.41

Spread vs growth

-4.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-43.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$1.70

Spread vs growth

-24.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

-20.9%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$2.75

Spread vs growth

-47.0%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -81.6%

Total return

-81.6%

Start / end P/E

1.0x → 0.6x

EPS bridge

89.20 → 28.60

Residual

+29.0%

EPS growth-67.9%
Multiple rerating-42.7%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+29.0%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.