StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ALDBL.PA$3.76-1.05%
Fair $3.76+0.0%

ALDBL.PA

Bernard Loiseau S.A.

Consumer Cyclical / RestaurantsParis

$3.76

-0.04 (-1.05%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3.76Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 54/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF n/d · quality 48.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 50/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

54/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ALDBL.PALocal privado en este navegador · Bernard Loiseau S.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$7M

P/E

3.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.7x

↓

ROE

40.8%

↑

Gross Margin

50.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.45

↑
52-Week Range$4
$3$4

TradingView lightweight chart

ALDBL.PA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3.760Periodo -47.0%
Fair value: $3.760

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+8.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

—

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $8.1M · net income $1.9M · FCF —

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

50.2%+3.2% pts

Operating margin

0.6%-6.4% pts

Net margin

23.5%+18.2% pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$8.1M$8.1M$8.8M$8.1M$6.3M
Net Income$1.9M$1.9M$134000.00$-823000.00$326000.00
EBITDA$2.6M$2.6M$798000.00$212000.00$720000.00
EPS1.041.040.07-0.450.18
Gross Margin50.2%50.2%51.5%51.8%47.0%
Operating Margin0.6%0.6%-1.5%-7.1%7.0%
Net Margin23.5%23.5%1.5%-10.2%5.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.451.453.143.490.74
Current Ratio1.151.15———
Returns
ROE40.8%40.8%4.8%-31.6%9.5%
Valuation
P/E3.653.6552.86—18.33
EV/EBITDA4.704.7016.9359.648.51
P/B1.481.482.442.581.75
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-8.2%-8.2%8.6%29.3%—
EPS Growth1385.7%1385.7%115.6%-350.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-31.5%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.33

Spread vs growth

1417.3%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-17.2%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.40

Spread vs growth

1403.0%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

-4.6%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.65

Spread vs growth

1390.3%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +21.3%

Total return

+21.3%

Start / end P/E

44.3x → 3.6x

EPS bridge

0.07 → 1.04

Residual

-1272.6%

EPS growth+1385.7%
Multiple rerating-91.8%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-1272.6%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.