StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ALDUX.PA$1.63+0.00%
Fair $1.63+0.0%

ALDUX.PA

ALDUX.PA

Communication Services / Advertising AgenciesParis

$1.63

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.63Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $946000.00 · quality 59.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 74/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ALDUX.PALocal privado en este navegador · ALDUX.PA
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$10M

P/E

4.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

3.6x

↓

ROE

46.7%

↑

Gross Margin

40.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.64

↑
52-Week Range$2
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

ALDUX.PA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.630Periodo -97.5%
Fair value: $1.630

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.4%

FCF CAGR

+0.6%

FCF margin

5.3%

FCF / Net income

0.60x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $24.6M · net income $2.2M · FCF $1.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

40.6%-3.6% pts

Operating margin

10.7%+3.2% pts

Net margin

8.8%-8.5% pts

FCF margin

5.3%-0.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$24.6M$24.6M$24.6M$22.1M$23.6M
Net Income$2.2M$2.2M$3.7M$2.3M$4.1M
EBITDA$4.3M$4.3M$4.4M$3.7M$5.5M
EPS——0.600.360.65
Gross Margin40.6%40.6%42.5%46.8%44.1%
Operating Margin10.7%10.7%12.5%11.1%7.5%
Net Margin8.8%8.8%15.2%10.2%17.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.641.642.22-2.33-0.48
Current Ratio1.001.00———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.3M$1.3M$912000.00$946000.00$1.3M
Returns
ROE46.7%46.7%153.2%-178.7%-116.6%
Valuation
P/E4.794.792.463.162.12
EV/EBITDA3.583.582.912.221.52
P/B2.202.203.77——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth0.0%0.0%11.3%-6.4%—
EPS Growth——65.4%-44.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -38.3%

Total return

-38.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.60 → n/d

Residual

-38.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-38.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.