StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ALNSE.PA$50.00+4.44%
Fair $50.00+0.0%

ALNSE.PA

NSE S.A.

Technology / Scientific & Technical InstrumentsParis

$50.00

+2.10 (+4.44%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $50.00Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 46/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $3.2M · quality 46.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 28/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

46/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ALNSE.PALocal privado en este navegador · NSE S.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$165M

P/E

30.9x

↑

EV/EBITDA

15.2x

↑

ROE

10.9%

↑

Gross Margin

49.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.64

↑
52-Week Range$50
$36$54

TradingView lightweight chart

ALNSE.PA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $49.40Periodo +337.2%
Fair value: $50.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+18.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

2.9%

FCF / Net income

0.59x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $109.6M · net income $5.3M · FCF $3.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

49.0%-13.4% pts

Operating margin

8.8%+4.2% pts

Net margin

4.9%+0.2% pts

FCF margin

2.9%+6.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$109.6M$109.6M$103.6M$77.0M$65.6M
Net Income$5.3M$5.3M$3.6M$4.1M$3.1M
EBITDA$11.8M$11.8M$10.1M$8.9M$6.4M
EPS——1.141.300.96
Gross Margin49.0%49.0%43.9%55.2%62.4%
Operating Margin8.8%8.8%6.8%7.1%4.6%
Net Margin4.9%4.9%3.5%5.4%4.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.640.640.180.170.17
Current Ratio1.701.70———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$3.2M$3.2M$11.3M$2.4M$-2.5M
Returns
ROE10.9%10.9%8.7%10.6%8.5%
Valuation
P/E30.8630.8625.2220.7417.40
EV/EBITDA15.2215.228.909.768.33
P/B3.363.362.192.191.48
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth5.8%5.8%34.5%17.4%—
EPS Growth——-12.3%35.2%—
Dividend Yield0.5%0.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +14.6%

Total return

+14.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.14 → n/d

Residual

+14.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+14.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.