StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ALOPM.PA$0.39-1.28%
Fair $0.39+0.0%

ALOPM.PA

Oncodesign Precision Medicine Société anonyme

Healthcare / BiotechnologyParis

$0.39

-0.00 (-1.28%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.39Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF n/d · quality 66.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 50/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists.
Thesis & Journal · ALOPM.PALocal privado en este navegador · Oncodesign Precision Medicine Société anonyme
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$7M

P/E

1.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.1x

↓

ROE

10.4%

↑

Gross Margin

3726.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.12

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

ALOPM.PA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.385Periodo -54.7%
Fair value: $0.385

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-68.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

—

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $261148.1 · net income $5.5M · FCF —

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

3726.1%+3720.4% pts

Operating margin

3146.9%+3167.1% pts

Net margin

2098.3%+2101.2% pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$261148.06$261148.06$207040.00$1.1M$8.0M
Net Income$5.5M$5.5M$-7.2M$-8.1M$-231181.00
EBITDA$6.1M$6.1M$-7.3M$-9.5M$-1.4M
EPS———-0.49-0.01
Gross Margin3726.1%3726.1%-3039.8%-615.4%5.8%
Operating Margin3146.9%3146.9%-3770.8%-927.4%-20.2%
Net Margin2098.3%2098.3%-3482.2%-754.6%-2.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.120.12-17.652.390.22
Current Ratio1.861.86———
Returns
ROE10.4%10.4%1679.0%-219.2%-2.0%
Valuation
P/E1.281.28———
EV/EBITDA2.152.15———
P/B0.130.13—8.562.32
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth26.1%26.1%-80.7%-86.6%—
EPS Growth———-3390.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +16.7%

Total return

+16.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

+16.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+16.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.