StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AMEENJI.BO$146.80-6.94%
Fair $146.80+0.0%

AMEENJI.BO

AMEENJI.BO

Industrials / RailroadsBSE

$146.80

-10.95 (-6.94%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $146.80Fund rank 21/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 27/D
F-Score: 6/9
High Debt

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 14%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-62.9M · quality 39.0/100

Data gap 21/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 27/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

27/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 2.07, above the 2.0 threshold
Thesis & Journal · AMEENJI.BOLocal privado en este navegador · AMEENJI.BO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.7B

P/E

20.6x

↑

EV/EBITDA

11.1x

↑

ROE

36.2%

↑

Gross Margin

40.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

2.07

↑
52-Week Range$147
$96$175

TradingView lightweight chart

AMEENJI.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $146.80Periodo +38.4%
Fair value: $146.80

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+12.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-3.6%

FCF / Net income

-0.42x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $940.5M · net income $80.3M · FCF $-33.7M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

40.5%+11.3% pts

Operating margin

16.6%+5.9% pts

Net margin

8.5%+3.8% pts

FCF margin

-3.6%+4.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$940.5M$940.5M$833.4M$740.8M
Net Income$80.3M$80.3M$43.1M$35.0M
EBITDA$189.7M$189.7M$130.4M$85.9M
EPS——3.823.10
Gross Margin40.5%40.5%34.2%29.2%
Operating Margin16.6%16.6%12.3%10.7%
Net Margin8.5%8.5%5.2%4.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity2.072.072.472.18
Current Ratio1.371.37——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-33.7M$-33.7M$-109.1M$-62.9M
Returns
ROE36.2%36.2%30.4%35.6%
Valuation
P/E20.6220.62——
EV/EBITDA11.1411.14——
P/B7.477.47——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth12.9%12.9%12.5%—
EPS Growth——23.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +38.4%

Total return

+38.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

3.82 → n/d

Residual

+38.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+38.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.