StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ANG.L$50.00+3.09%
Fair $50.00+0.0%

ANG.L

Angling Direct PLC

Consumer Cyclical / Specialty RetailLSE

$50.00

+1.50 (+3.09%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $50.00Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $2.4M · quality 45.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 19/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ANG.LLocal privado en este navegador · Angling Direct PLC
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$36M

P/E

16.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

440.7x

↑

ROE

5.1%

↑

Gross Margin

37.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.31

↓
52-Week Range$50
$44$60

TradingView lightweight chart

ANG.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $48.50Periodo -26.5%
Fair value: $50.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+11.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

2.3%

FCF / Net income

1.15x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $103.9M · net income $2.1M · FCF $2.4M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

37.6%+2.8% pts

Operating margin

3.1%+2.0% pts

Net margin

2.0%+1.3% pts

FCF margin

2.3%+3.3% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$103.9M$103.9M$91.3M$81.7M$74.1M
Net Income$2.1M$2.1M$1.4M$1.2M$539000.00
EBITDA$8.3M$8.3M$6.9M$5.9M$4.6M
EPS———0.020.01
Gross Margin37.6%37.6%36.2%34.9%34.8%
Operating Margin3.1%3.1%2.2%1.6%1.1%
Net Margin2.0%2.0%1.6%1.5%0.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.310.310.330.300.31
Current Ratio2.432.43———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$2.4M$2.4M$-275000.00$3.6M$-757000.00
Returns
ROE5.1%5.1%3.6%3.2%1.4%
Valuation
P/E16.6716.67—2579.624130.43
EV/EBITDA440.70440.70451.46537.32482.27
P/B89.4189.4178.7481.7759.74
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth13.8%13.8%11.9%10.2%—
EPS Growth———127.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +1.0%

Total return

+1.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

+1.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+1.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.