StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ANGX$2.88+3.23%
Fair $2.88+0.0%

ANGX

Angel Studios, Inc.

Communication Services / EntertainmentNYSE

$2.88

+0.09 (+3.23%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.88Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 22/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-60.5M · quality 57.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

22/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 5Warnings: 0unknown: 5
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ANGXLocal privado en este navegador · Angel Studios, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$537M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

542.3%

↑

Gross Margin

61.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

-3.20

↓
52-Week Range$3
$2$20

TradingView lightweight chart

ANGX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.880Periodo -77.8%
Fair value: $2.880

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-31.7%

FCF / Net income

0.60x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $321.6M · net income $-170.5M · FCF $-101.9M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

61.2%— pts

Operating margin

-51.0%— pts

Net margin

-53.0%— pts

FCF margin

-31.7%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$321.6M$321.6M$96.5M$202.4M$75.5M—
Net Income$-170.5M$-170.5M$-88.3M$13.4M$-13.7M—
EBITDA$-143.3M$-143.3M$-74.0M$20.5M$-12.7M—
EPS-1.10-1.10-0.550.08-0.09—
Gross Margin61.2%61.2%54.0%57.5%46.5%—
Operating Margin-51.0%-51.0%-89.8%6.1%-12.4%—
Net Margin-53.0%-53.0%-91.5%6.6%-18.2%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-3.20-3.201.680.140.18—
Current Ratio0.590.59————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-101.9M$-101.9M$-60.5M$5.3M$-12.8M—
Returns
ROE542.3%542.3%-1040.3%33.6%-62.3%—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth233.2%233.2%-52.3%168.1%——
EPS Growth-99.9%-99.9%-760.5%197.5%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -77.8%

Total return

-77.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.55 → -1.10

Residual

-77.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-77.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.