StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ANL.BO$261.50+0.00%
Fair $261.50+0.0%

ANL.BO

ANL.BO

Healthcare / Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericBSE

$261.50

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $261.50Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-31.6M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 7/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ANL.BOLocal privado en este navegador · ANL.BO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.9B

P/E

27.9x

↑

EV/EBITDA

27.4x

↑

ROE

14.3%

↑

Gross Margin

28.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.12

↓
52-Week Range$262
$150$300

TradingView lightweight chart

ANL.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $261.50Periodo +36.8%
Fair value: $261.50

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+126.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-71.4%

FCF / Net income

-4.74x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $336.0M · net income $50.7M · FCF $-240.1M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

28.3%-6.2% pts

Operating margin

19.7%+3.3% pts

Net margin

15.1%+5.4% pts

FCF margin

-71.4%-94.7% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$336.0M$336.0M$160.0M$50.1M$29.0M
Net Income$50.7M$50.7M$25.0M$8.2M$2.8M
EBITDA$70.1M$70.1M$37.3M$14.0M$7.6M
EPS——3.451.140.39
Gross Margin28.3%28.3%34.0%35.0%34.5%
Operating Margin19.7%19.7%21.9%23.0%16.4%
Net Margin15.1%15.1%15.6%16.4%9.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.120.120.722.007.50
Current Ratio14.2714.27———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-240.1M$-240.1M$-31.6M$719000.00$6.8M
Returns
ROE14.3%14.3%46.8%75.8%106.7%
Valuation
P/E27.9427.94———
EV/EBITDA27.4527.45———
P/B5.345.34———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth110.0%110.0%219.7%72.4%—
EPS Growth——204.3%192.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +36.8%

Total return

+36.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

3.45 → n/d

Residual

+36.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+36.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.