StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
APT.WA$26.20+2.75%
Fair $26.20+0.0%

APT.WA

Apator S.A.

Industrials / Electrical Equipment & PartsWarsaw

$26.20

+0.70 (+2.75%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $26.20Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 59/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $71.6M · quality 60.3/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 40/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

59/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · APT.WALocal privado en este navegador · Apator S.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$760M

P/E

8.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.6x

↓

ROE

12.2%

↑

Gross Margin

25.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.21

↓
52-Week Range$26
$19$27

TradingView lightweight chart

APT.WA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $26.20Periodo +2593.5%
Fair value: $26.20

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

2.9%

FCF / Net income

0.43x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.20B · net income $79.1M · FCF $34.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

25.4%+4.6% pts

Operating margin

6.2%+2.1% pts

Net margin

6.6%+6.0% pts

FCF margin

2.9%+3.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.20B$1.20B$1.23B$1.14B$1.08B
Net Income$79.1M$79.1M$73.1M$8.1M$6.6M
EBITDA$157.8M$157.8M$149.8M$102.0M$87.8M
EPS——2.520.280.23
Gross Margin25.4%25.4%25.6%22.5%20.7%
Operating Margin6.2%6.2%7.2%4.9%4.1%
Net Margin6.6%6.6%6.0%0.7%0.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.210.210.260.450.53
Current Ratio1.551.55———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$34.3M$34.3M$93.9M$71.6M$-10.9M
Returns
ROE12.2%12.2%12.4%1.5%1.2%
Valuation
P/E8.738.736.9056.9665.13
EV/EBITDA5.565.564.296.687.86
P/B1.171.170.860.860.81
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-2.1%-2.1%8.0%5.1%—
EPS Growth——800.0%21.7%—
Dividend Yield7.1%7.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +44.2%

Total return

+44.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

2.52 → n/d

Residual

+37.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+7.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+37.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.