StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ARSHIYA.BO$1.12-2.61%
Fair $1.12+0.0%

ARSHIYA.BO

Arshiya Limited

Industrials / Integrated Freight & LogisticsBSE

$1.12

-0.03 (-2.61%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.12Fund rank 35/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 22/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $711.2M · quality 74.3/100

Data gap 35/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 81/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

22/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ARSHIYA.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Arshiya Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$295M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

89.1%

↑

Gross Margin

-1.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

-0.58

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

ARSHIYA.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.120Periodo -53.3%
Fair value: $1.120

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2024 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.4%

FCF CAGR

+17.4%

FCF margin

60.7%

FCF / Net income

-0.03x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.54B · net income $-28.19B · FCF $937.0M

2022-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

-1.1%-29.5% pts

Operating margin

-21.8%-36.9% pts

Net margin

-1825.4%-2107.8% pts

FCF margin

60.7%+15.4% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.54B$1.54B$1.52B$1.50B
Net Income$-28.19B$-28.19B$-3.45B$4.24B
EBITDA$-21.77B$-21.77B$1.48B$6.65B
EPS-106.98-106.98-13.1516.11
Gross Margin-1.1%-1.1%-2.9%28.4%
Operating Margin-21.8%-21.8%-24.3%15.2%
Net Margin-1825.4%-1825.4%-227.6%282.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.58-0.586.653.47
Current Ratio0.080.08——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$937.0M$937.0M$711.2M$680.1M
Returns
ROE89.1%89.1%-219.0%135.8%
Valuation
P/E———2.04
EV/EBITDA——8.082.94
P/B——0.932.80
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.7%1.7%1.1%—
EPS Growth-713.5%-713.5%-181.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -60.7%

Total return

-60.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-13.15 → -106.98

Residual

-60.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-60.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.