StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ASCNE.SW$6.24+0.65%
Fair $6.24+0.0%

ASCNE.SW

Ascom Holding AG

Healthcare / Health Information ServicesSwiss

$6.24

+0.04 (+0.65%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $6.24Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 49/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $16.3M · quality 41.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 32/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

49/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · ASCNE.SWLocal privado en este navegador · Ascom Holding AG
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$229M

P/E

14.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.0x

↓

ROE

18.9%

↑

Gross Margin

48.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$6
$3$6

TradingView lightweight chart

ASCNE.SW price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $6.240Periodo +66.2%
Fair value: $6.240

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-0.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

7.4%

FCF / Net income

1.42x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $292.1M · net income $15.1M · FCF $21.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

48.2%+2.4% pts

Operating margin

6.9%+2.3% pts

Net margin

5.2%+1.5% pts

FCF margin

7.4%+8.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$292.1M$292.1M$286.7M$297.3M$297.4M
Net Income$15.1M$15.1M$3.7M$17.4M$11.0M
EBITDA$32.5M$32.5M$20.9M$30.7M$25.4M
EPS0.420.420.100.480.30
Gross Margin48.2%48.2%46.5%47.6%45.8%
Operating Margin6.9%6.9%2.7%6.8%4.7%
Net Margin5.2%5.2%1.3%5.9%3.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity————0.14
Current Ratio1.661.66———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$21.5M$21.5M$4.5M$16.3M$-3.2M
Returns
ROE18.9%18.9%5.0%22.1%15.0%
Valuation
P/E14.8614.86———
EV/EBITDA5.985.98———
P/B2.802.80———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.9%1.9%-3.6%-0.0%—
EPS Growth320.0%320.0%-79.2%60.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

9.6%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$0.55

Spread vs growth

310.4%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

9.8%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$0.67

Spread vs growth

310.2%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

9.9%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$1.08

Spread vs growth

310.1%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +66.2%

Total return

+66.2%

Start / end P/E

37.6x → 14.9x

EPS bridge

0.10 → 0.42

Residual

-193.4%

EPS growth+320.0%
Multiple rerating-60.4%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-193.4%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.