StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ATV.AX$0.01-12.50%
Fair $0.01+0.0%

ATV.AX

ActivePort Group Ltd

Technology / Information Technology ServicesASX

$0.01

-0.00 (-12.50%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.01Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 33/D
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.8M · quality 60.7/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 26/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

33/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -44.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ATV.AXLocal privado en este navegador · ActivePort Group Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$16M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-44.9%

↓

Gross Margin

54.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.29

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

ATV.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.014Periodo -92.8%
Fair value: $0.014

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-18.5%

FCF / Net income

0.29x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $15.0M · net income $-9.5M · FCF $-2.8M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

54.1%— pts

Operating margin

-10.5%— pts

Net margin

-63.1%— pts

FCF margin

-18.5%— pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$15.0M$15.0M$19.4M$10.6M—
Net Income$-9.5M$-9.5M$-3.4M$-6.7M—
EBITDA$-7.6M$-7.6M$-1.2M$-6.1M—
EPS-0.03-0.03-0.01-0.13—
Gross Margin54.1%54.1%49.2%41.2%—
Operating Margin-10.5%-10.5%-21.1%-71.0%—
Net Margin-63.1%-63.1%-17.5%-62.8%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.290.290.190.160.09
Current Ratio1.221.22———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.8M$-2.8M$-2.7M$-8.8M—
Returns
ROE-44.9%-44.9%-12.1%-23.8%—
Valuation
P/B0.210.210.960.09—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-22.9%-22.9%82.4%——
EPS Growth-184.9%-184.9%92.0%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +75.0%

Total return

+75.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → -0.03

Residual

+75.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+75.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.