StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AUSTERE.BO$48.00+0.00%
Fair $48.00+0.0%

AUSTERE.BO

AUSTERE.BO

Technology / Information Technology ServicesBSE

$48.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $48.00Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 42/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $3.3M · quality 46.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

42/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · AUSTERE.BOLocal privado en este navegador · AUSTERE.BO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$503M

P/E

8.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.3x

↓

ROE

24.7%

↑

Gross Margin

72.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.03

↓
52-Week Range$48
$41$79

TradingView lightweight chart

AUSTERE.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $48.00Periodo -39.5%
Fair value: $48.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+10.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

1.7%

FCF / Net income

0.08x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $186.2M · net income $40.1M · FCF $3.3M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

72.8%+4.0% pts

Operating margin

28.5%+13.1% pts

Net margin

21.6%+10.0% pts

FCF margin

1.7%+8.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$186.2M$186.2M$185.7M$153.6M
Net Income$40.1M$40.1M$41.5M$17.7M
EBITDA$60.2M$60.2M$62.8M$28.8M
EPS3.833.833.961.69
Gross Margin72.8%72.8%69.5%68.8%
Operating Margin28.5%28.5%29.9%15.3%
Net Margin21.6%21.6%22.3%11.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.030.030.050.16
Current Ratio4.104.10——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$3.3M$3.3M$25.7M$-11.0M
Returns
ROE24.7%24.7%46.1%36.5%
Valuation
P/E8.598.59——
EV/EBITDA7.337.33——
P/B3.093.09——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth0.3%0.3%20.9%—
EPS Growth-3.2%-3.2%134.2%—
Dividend Yield0.8%0.8%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

3.6%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$4.26

Spread vs growth

-6.8%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

6.1%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$5.15

Spread vs growth

-9.3%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

8.0%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$8.30

Spread vs growth

-11.2%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -38.7%

Total return

-38.7%

Start / end P/E

20.0x → 12.5x

EPS bridge

3.96 → 3.83

Residual

+1.2%

EPS growth-3.2%
Multiple rerating-37.5%
Dividend+0.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+1.2%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.